Suggestions and Bug Reports
-
The listings are generally accurate, but we’ve had a small handful slip through since launch. The game names in the software are always correct though, so cross-referencing will consistently work (I appreciate that’s difficult under time pressure).
As you mentioned, this data isn’t well organised anywhere online, and some of these games are obscure, so we’ve had to map them ourselves. That creates a trade-off: we can either be overly restrictive and cut out value bets, or allow the occasional mapping error, which we continuously work to reduce.
Given we’re already very close to a 0% error rate, the fact that the true +EV selections are still shown on the software, and that an extremely rare -EV bet doesn’t materially affect a still very profitable strategy, this is the approach we’ve chosen.